Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
View Profile
17 Aug, 09 > 23 Aug, 09
5 Jan, 09 > 11 Jan, 09
29 Dec, 08 > 4 Jan, 09
15 Sep, 08 > 21 Sep, 08
4 Aug, 08 > 10 Aug, 08
30 Jun, 08 > 6 Jul, 08
2 Jun, 08 > 8 Jun, 08
31 Dec, 07 > 6 Jan, 08
23 Jul, 07 > 29 Jul, 07
26 Mar, 07 > 1 Apr, 07
26 Feb, 07 > 4 Mar, 07
23 Oct, 06 > 29 Oct, 06
3 Jul, 06 > 9 Jul, 06
20 Feb, 06 > 26 Feb, 06
13 Feb, 06 > 19 Feb, 06
17 Oct, 05 > 23 Oct, 05
10 Oct, 05 > 16 Oct, 05
15 Aug, 05 > 21 Aug, 05
8 Aug, 05 > 14 Aug, 05
30 May, 05 > 5 Jun, 05
23 May, 05 > 29 May, 05
28 Mar, 05 > 3 Apr, 05
24 Jan, 05 > 30 Jan, 05
17 Jan, 05 > 23 Jan, 05
8 Nov, 04 > 14 Nov, 04
13 Sep, 04 > 19 Sep, 04
23 Aug, 04 > 29 Aug, 04
2 Feb, 04 > 8 Feb, 04
26 Jan, 04 > 1 Feb, 04
22 Dec, 03 > 28 Dec, 03
8 Dec, 03 > 14 Dec, 03
3 Nov, 03 > 9 Nov, 03
27 Oct, 03 > 2 Nov, 03
20 Oct, 03 > 26 Oct, 03
13 Oct, 03 > 19 Oct, 03
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Meditations on Teaching, Learning, and Understanding
Saturday, 18 October 2003
Introvert as Performer
Early last summer, there was a feature published in our local daily newspaper, the Vancouver Sun, that I cut out and kept because it was so personally reassuring.

It was about Brian Little, originally from Victoria but now a popular psychology professor at Harvard. The reason he's so popular? He simply loves to teach, managing, as he put it, that "creative tendency between whimsy and gravitas that is something that professors who truly profess need to strive for."

He describes his improvisational method as being like a symphony: "There's a slow movement and there's an allegro movement. You can be allegro vivace for three lecturs and then largo."

The improvisational metaphor is a fascinating one, and one I'll no doubt beat to death in a future entry. But what really fascinated me when I first read about Prof. Little was his personality. You see, like me, he considers himself an introvert.

I didn't return to university to become a teacher until I was in my early 30's because, although I loved teaching swimming and did so for 12 years (despite the funny-coloured hair and constant whiff of chlorine about my person that it generated) I never thought I was the right type of person. I'm not talkative, I don't enjoy being in the spotlight, I don't like telling people what to do: now where I came up with this stereotype in the first place I don't know, but I fully bought into it.

So this was what was reassuring about reading Prof. Little's profile. He doesn't fit the stereotype either. As an introvert what he has learned to do is turn it "on" in order to perform. And then, after a lecture, he seeks solitude to recharge himself, even going as far as hiding in a washroom cubicle. Apparently, he's not alone - when he confessed this to CBC radio-broadcaster Peter Gzowski during "Morningside," Gzowski admitted that he did much the same thing.

"It's a fine balance, [Little] says, because introverts do make good professors - or radio hosts - attuned as they are to other people's cues, constantly scanning the room to make sure they haven't lost anyone. If they have introverts will adjust their style mid-lecture, throwing in a different example, elaborating a particular point.

'The risk is that they can burn out, because in a sense you're acting out of character. That's why we really need those restorative niches.'"

It makes sense then that some of Little's academic research has to do with what he calls "personal projects." These are core projects that are so meaningful to the individual that they can make one act out of character. Little says, "'One project for me is to profess with passion.... So, that as a professor, I am 'on' as a pseudo-extrovert.' This does not make it wrong or phoney [sic], he says. But it does help to understand what is occurring, so that you can take time to re-balance and reduce the risk of burnout."

I used to feel guilty that I prefer to spend my lunch break quietly at my classroom desk rather than chatting with my colleagues in the staff room, or that I spend most of my weekends by myself, just milling around in a semi-meditative (vegetative?) state. But really, my behaviour makes sense given who I am.

A couple of years ago, at a June staff farewell function I gave a very energetic presentation, acting pretty much as I normally do in front of my students, and surprising most of my colleagues who have never been in my classroom.

Afterwards, one of them, a wonderful woman and excellent teacher - and, may I add, a complete extrovert - came up to me and said "You shouldn't hide your light under a bushel so much!" After reading about Brian Little and his theories I now know that isn't true. I'm not hiding anything; I'm just recharging.

[All quotes are from the Saturday, July 5th edition of The Vancouver Sun]



Posted by msarmstrong at 3:22 PM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 13 October 2003
Specialist or Generalist?
"I teach kids."

That's supposed to be the definitive answer to give when someone asks you what you teach. In reality when asked, people either describe the level they teach, the subject(s), or both.

And then there's middle school.

Last year my answer would have been "I teach grade 8 math/science/French/drama" and, having taught those subjects for five years, it would have been an answer with which I was pretty comfortable.

Then I changed schools. I still teach grade 8, I still teach math and French, but now CAPP (which I haven't taught in five years), Social Studies (which I haven't taught in six), and Art (which I've never ever taught, although I took oil painting lessons as a kid and know my colour wheel inside and out dammit) are now supposedly among my repertoire.

This, I admit, scares me. I hate to represent myself as something I'm not - the fact I'm teaching French after posting straight C's through my high school French career still bothers me. I am a teacher, I've taken methods courses in these subjects, but I'm hardly a specialist (although I'm very slowly working towards becoming one in math). Is that fair to the kids?

One could argue that it's not, that I lack the requisite knowledge to lead the more capable kids to "exceed expectations" (as the current jargon goes). And it's true - I find myself saying "I don't know" more often than I like or, the tested-and-true "Why don't you look that up?" dodge.

On the other hand, one could also argue that you can know everything in the world about a subject but if you can't get it across to a bunch of rangy 12/13 year olds then what's the point? Six years ago, I had little to no experience teaching math or science. Every summer I did a whole bunch of reading and research about the curriculum topics and ways to teach them. Every year I tried new things - some worked and some practically burst into flames before my eyes. And last spring, when I collected and read my students' anonymous evaluation forms about the past year's work, I realized that the majority of them not only liked math and science but that their interest had increased because of our work together.

So, when I sit down, as I did this very afternoon, wondering "What on earth will we do in Social Studies this week and what's the most effective way to do it?" I need to remind myself that with time it will come. And what matters most is what I really teach: kids.

Posted by msarmstrong at 4:52 PM PDT
Updated: Monday, 13 October 2003 4:54 PM PDT
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older